Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Vuescan Settings and Tri-X
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Tue Feb 7 02:23:42 2006
References: <1b545fc1b589c3.1b589c31b545fc@shaw.ca> <6.1.0.6.2.20060206223144.12072cc0@192.168.100.42> <a2f8f4470602070147s5d210b63ne7a90f34721560f@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20060207015706.05e57c78@192.168.100.42>

You're probably right. I'm just lazy with a lot of disk space.

Every time I think about changing it to 16-bit grey, I forget.

Daniel

On 2/7/06, Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> wrote:
>
> At 01:47 AM 2/7/2006, you wrote:
>
> >On 2/7/06, Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > OUTPUT:
> > > 16 bit Gray. Do NOT use 8 bits, you lose information big time.
> > >
> >
> >That's it ...
> >
> >I even go the whole hog (but am getting tired of it) 48bit RGB output.
> >
> >It's a waste, but I want RGB files for various reasons.
>
> I don't bother to save RGB because
> a) either I work in Photoshop, then I will save it in .psd format, and
> b) if I work in wet print, then it doesn't matter :-)
>
> Anyway, I do not believe you gain any extra information going from 16 bits
> gray to 48 bit RGB from a B&W neg.
>
>
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
> use richard at imagecraft.com)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] OT: Vuescan Settings and Tri-X)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] OT: Vuescan Settings and Tri-X)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] OT: Vuescan Settings and Tri-X)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] OT: Vuescan Settings and Tri-X)