Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Barney, again, I wasn't responding to your response - I was responding to Marc's repeated posts of last night. And I did not, and would not ever have the temerity to suggest that Marc shouldn't use his technology of choice - whether or not it will allow him to achieve his creative ends. His life, his choice. On 2/7/06 2:08 PM, "Barney Quinn" <bquinn@sgi.com> wrote: > > > I think that Marc should use whatever kind of photographic technology he > wants > to > use. It's his art, and his prerogative to make what ever choices will > enhance > his > work and allow him to achieve his creative ends. If he doesn't like > digital, > then > he shouldn't use it. I'll go a step further and say that I, too, am one of > the > people who wonder about what seems to be a shift from film to digital on > this > list. But, I don't want to get into that. I think that it is fair to say > that > we > are a leica-centric on-line community rather than a strict leica-users > group. > But, that's OK with me. I think that the diversity on this list is its > greatest > strength. > > I am not one of the Alpha members of this list. I never will be. I don't > even > want > to be. I don't often know enough about anything on this list to be able to > comment > on it intelligently, so I don't. Perhaps I misunderstood. My reading of > yesterday's thread on this subject is that Marc had asked several times > what > RIP > meant. I thought that he was asking because he wanted to know. I can't > tell a > NOOKY from a ROOKEY. But, it just so happens that I do know something about > image > processing and computing. I thought, as a fair exchange for all the > information I > have gained from this list and for which I have never paid a fee or made a > contribution in return, that I would offer what I could in the way of an > explanation. If I have wasted the groups time, I am sorry. But, my attempt > at > an > explanation didn't come easily, and it was my attempt to give the group > what > benefit I could of my years of experience, just as those who have had > years of > experience in photography have offered theirs. > > Barney > > > > "B. D. Colen" wrote: > >> Okay, I wasn't going to post this unless this started up again today...but >> since it has....(and all due respect to you, Barney :-) ) >> ... >> This is perhaps the single most inane thread ever to take up LUG >> bandwidth. >> :-) >> Tina is not a techie. I am not a techie. Ted is not a techie, nor are >> most >> of the hundreds of other people on this list who have figured out - mostly > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information