Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's not quite as bad as I thought it was at first. It _is_ difficult (=time-consuming) to find the same information that used to be just a couple of clicks away. Now you have to navigate and make multiple choices. On the other hand, there is a lot _more_ than there used to be and the press releases are actually current rather than a couple of years old. I'll still be buying their stuff. HP5+ is my preference in the ISO 400 range so I'm not really making any extra effort to support them :-) Daniel On 2/23/06, Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote: > Boy do they ever have some work to do. That site is absolutely > miserable if you are looking for information. Fortunately, their real > site is still up and working: > > http://www.ilford.com > > The new one seems to have been done by high-school students in their > spare time (and for spare change). > > I hope they get it worked out before they do a definite split from the > mother company. Ilford stuff is great, but the new site isn't going to > do it justice. > > Daniel > > > On 2/23/06, Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote: > > http://www.ilfordphoto.com/home.asp > > > > Frank Filippone > > red735i@earthlink.net > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >