Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Thu Feb 23 17:19:13 2006
References: <9b678e0602221659y6619bb2fp9176ecef4b4598ba@mail.gmail.com> <43FD1511.1060904@adrenaline.com> <9b678e0602221852u567a926x9a66976d75ee468e@mail.gmail.com> <43FD2791.9040206@adrenaline.com> <9b678e0602221916j5df65dd9t2b2a286b9f194341@mail.gmail.com> <066141F2-F013-464B-934F-FA3F493B5DA9@ralgo.nl> <6.2.3.4.2.20060223133203.02a83060@mail.rhtc.net> <EEE0C0BF-5895-4C66-94F6-30C1260279BE@ralgo.nl>

Bruce,
I don't shoot digital so these were originally shot in Velvia.  My workflow
would be to scan at 14bit at maximum resolution of the scanner doing as much
prescan adjustments as makes sense.  Scans are saved as an uncompressed
TIF.  Images are manipulated in PS mostly spotting, minor levels and curves
work, moderate dodging and burning, occasionally cloning something out like
a powerline then saved as a renamed TIFF.  Only when resized for the web are
my images changed to JPEG's.

When I ulitmately switch some work to digital originals the work flow would
be to shoot RAW, dump the card to harddrive, burn to DVD and archive the
DVD.  Images selected for further work would then be manipulated and saved
as an Adobe DNR.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 2/23/06, bruce <bruce@ralgo.nl> wrote:
>
> Agreed, but I assumed that the images were originally shot as JPEGs.
>
> B.
>
> On 23-feb-2006, at 19:35, Tina Manley wrote:
>
> > At 01:27 PM 2/23/2006, you wrote:
> >> Don't know if this is teaching grandma .................... , but, I
> >> heard a tip the other night ............. that each time one modifies
> >> and saves a JPEG, the image deteriorates (often producing artifacts).
> >> They, JPEGs, after modification, should be saved under another name
> >> etc. etc.
> >>
> >> B.
> >
> > Saving under another name won't keep it from deteriorating.  Every
> > time you save it as a jpeg (under any name), it compresses again,
> > losing information.  If you need to work on a photo it's better to
> > do it as a tiff or another lossless format.  Instead of resaving
> > jpegs, start all over again with the tiff and make a new jpeg.
> > That's one reason (of many) to use RAW in digital cameras instead
> > of jpegs.
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > Tina Manley, ASMP
> > http://www.tinamanley.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI)
In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI)
Message from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI)
Message from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XI)