Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Repeated compression and decompression and then compression again, even at the same compression ratios, destroys real data. Do it enough times, and you get perfect garbage ( although it is a lot of times.) If you do not believe this, go ahead and try it. Now trying the same trick with making the file larger on re-compression, will do the same thing, and I suspect, make it happen even faster..... Remember, those pixels that were created are really not part of the actual scene. They are some form of interpolation. So upon re-compression, you have created even more and second generation artifacts. One last comment... Jpeg compression algorithms work least well on images that have rapid changes in image over relatively small areas of image. ( I mean to say that images like a bunch of bright lines or shapes on a perfectly white background is a lot of high frequency stuff going on. The opposite image that is very easy on JPG is a picture of an egg. Round, small changes in pixel values from one to another pixel.) Effectively this states that the worst image you can take to compress is one of like a chess board. Sudden changes in image across a 1 pixel boundary. SO if you try my suggestion,, pick something with lots of quick change in image pixel value.... don't try a landscape of gently rolling hills. Frank Filippone red735i@earthlink.net