Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Spooky church
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Thu Mar 2 18:32:21 2006
References: <90C6A538-98BF-4833-B1F2-2010A04F2029@dodo.com.au>

Rick, can you talk about this difficulty? How did you meter and how do
you think you should have? I've never used a really wide lens on my M
- I have the 35,50,90. Do you use the internal meter or do you use
incident metering?

Thanks

Adam


On 3/2/06, Rick Dykstra <rdcb37@dodo.com.au> wrote:
> http://members.dodo.com.au/rdcb37/spooky_church.jpg
>
> This image reveals how tricky it can be metering with the 21/2.8
> Asph.  Still, the underexposure kind of works.  The slide looks
> darker and moodier than this scan.
>
> This church has a remote and stark look about it.  It was relocated
> when the town of Adaminaby was flooded during construction of the
> Snowy Mountains hydro scheme.
>
> Rick.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Spooky church)
Reply from rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra) ([Leica] Spooky church)
In reply to: Message from rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra) ([Leica] Spooky church)