Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Sun Mar 12 12:45:23 2006
References: <4413E8A5.2090209@summaventures.com> <000001c645e2$e0b93f40$656c0e44@newukolbqveo9i>
 
On 3/12/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:

>
> Right now, I'm pursuing the 35/2.8, which is more of a challenge than the
> 35/3.5.
>

You want the classic b/w cream of the crop 35/2.8?

$60 will get you a Jupiter-12. I seriously doubt that the Summaron
35/2.8 would be as good, and at any rate it would absolutely not be
better.

http://gallery.leica-users.org/album08/05v35_0019
http://gallery.leica-users.org/album08/05v35_0024 (very close to wide-open)

Daniel
Replies: Reply from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)
Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)
 In reply to: Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)
Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)