Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 vs. 4/3 sensor
From: bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Tue Mar 21 06:45:07 2006

I have NOT had experience with the Digilux 2 sensor. But keep in mind that
is is smaller than the 4/3 sensor, and that the 4/3 bodies - O and P - take
interchangeable lenses.


On 3/21/06 9:26 AM, "Peter M.C. Werner" <pwerner@bluewin.ch> wrote:

> I am very satisfied with the results I get from the D2 and I use it more
> than the R9+DMR combination when traveling light, walking, skiing, etc.,
> which is quite often. Prints up to A3 size (11x16) are sharp, color
> rendition and dynamic range excellent, although of course not up to the
> DMR standards.
> 
> How does the sensor of 4/3 cameras compare with the Digilux 2 sensor?
> (size, technology, noise, etc.)
> 
> I was wondering whether anybody has had some hands-on experience with
> both type of cameras and has made some hands-on comparisons of the
> picture quality. 
> 
> Regards
> Peter Werner
> http://www.leicaphoto.net
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from pwerner at bluewin.ch (Peter M.C. Werner) ([Leica] Digilux 2 vs. 4/3 sensor)