Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George, No big deal. I did shoot a roll of 35mm earlier this year, and I have only been shooting digital for 1 1/2 years. My decision to buy the Hasselblad was based on several factors: - it is a beautiful piece of equipment - those big negatives are great - the price was ridiculously low - I want to do my part to support the film business - ... I am still working out whether the way I photograph is different between film and digital. Most of the images I have made with the Hasselblad have been on tripod (the portait of Michiel's father-in-law is the only handheld image in the PAW), so in theory it should be more deliberate, with more attention paid to the composition etc. Whether that is the case is for you guys to judge. Nathan Lottermoser George wrote: > And how did it feel to return to film? > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george@imagist.com > > > > On Mar 24, 2006, at 12:23 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > >> My PAWs for week 11 are therefore all film, and all square (except >> one image which I had to crop): >> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws/?page_id=18 >> >> These are really test shots with the Hassy more than anything else, >> but well--that's what I shot that week, and it is good to >> re-establish my street cred here by shooting film from time to time :-) > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS! General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507 Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog