Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Mar 25, 2006, at 9:29 AM, B. D. Colen wrote: > Those are gorgeous images, Tina. And yet, over the years, you and I > have > both seen similar sorts of images shot by photographers who, like > you, knew > what they were doing, that were shot using 1.4 Nikon, Canon, > Minolta, Zeiss, > Olympus, and, yes, Leica ( ;-) ) lenses. I would suggest that most > times > when it's impossible to get the shot without a lens faster than 1.4 > - and I > stress most - the overall lighting is just so damn low and flat > that even > with a Super Lens the resulting photo is just muddy and flat. Most > - stress > on most again - of the time when there are splashes of light in the > dark, as > in your photos, 1.4 will do the trick. But of course there are, > admittedly, > those couple times a year that fall outside the mostness, and then > it's have > faster glass or miss the shot. :-) The current lack of fast primes is one of the reasons I hesitate to move from Canon to Olympus. The lack of a 10MP or better E-2 is the other... Will von Dauster