Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank, Yes, the father of the groom just has to smile and say hello at the rehearsal- you have no real job, drink up and keep to yourself how much this is costing the father of the bride :) That's great you were able to get some candids getting ready. I find it very hard sometimes with getting ready shots of the groom/groomsmen because they tend to be the least interested in a stranger taking photos of them. Most of the time I'm lucky if I manage a good 10 minutes getting photos. Hey, were guys, we like to drink - not take photos. :) If relatives are there taking photos, they could care less. And if the guys are told to get ready 45 minutes before the photographer arrives, that means about 5 minutes for official photos since at least one groomsmen has gone missing due to either a lack of beer or food in the room. Or one case of one groomsmen just got out of jail 3 hrs ago - true story. I'm one those wedding photographers that encourage guests photos. Many times family/guests are just too intimidated by my "big" cameras/lenses to take any photos while I'm shooting. Many ask permission first as if they are doing something wrong. The more guests taking photos, the more candids I can get. And the couple notices that. If a guest gets in the way, it's just an "accidental" bump and they move(they're drunk anyway). Hope you captured some great moments. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Filippone" Subject: [Leica] I shot the wedding.....Long > About a year ago I posed my dilemma: My son was to be married, and I really > wanted to shoot the ( very traditional) wedding ( as a spectator). My wife > did not like the idea and told me so. The assembled LUG had many opinions, > mostly that sided with my wife. Leave the camera at home was the opinion. > > It was not in me to pass on what is a once in a lifetime opportunity. I > fretted a long time, and finally decided to take the camera ( M6 with 3 > lenses) and shoot what I wanted, outside the ceremony itself. I asked no > further permissions. I was flying by the seat of my pants. > > I behaved, mostly. During the rehearsal, I was pretty much free to do as I > wanted. ( do you have any idea what role the father of the groom really has > at the rehearsal? The word minimum is overstated.) I got some wonderful > opportunity to shoot from over the Minister's shoulder at the B+G from about > 3 feet away from their faces. It was absolutely breathtaking waiting for > the vows to be said, and being able to shoot their faces as they practiced > the words that would join them forever. > > At this event, I was handed a 4 page Excel spreadsheet of the schedule of > the next days' events. ( Corporate training told to peruse the schedule > with a detail to find missing data, and to pay no attention to the timeline > itself.) It was obvious that the official pro was not going to the Grooms > rooms until the guys were all dressed and ready for action. Opportunity > knocked. > > I took my camera to the dinner that evening and took candids. A few others > did as well. Not a big deal. No one cared that the groom's father had a > camera. > > The BIG DAY! I realized that using the camera at all during the ceremony > was inappropriate. But there was a working pro that would handle that part, > so no worries. It would be covered. > > As time went on, I decided to shoot the groomsmen, and especially my son, as > they prepared. I asked my son if this would be OK, and he said sure. I > dressed fast and went down to their rooms. The groomsmen were already > dressed. I took some candids as they milled around ( they were wondering > why they had to get dressed 45 minutes before the official photographer > arrived.) Suddenly there is a knock on the door and my son arrives..... > dressed, except for the tie. He could not figure out how to get it on > without help. The guys worked on him, making his presentable, while I shot > away. No pro is sight.... The pro showed up on time, and allowed me to > hang out while he shot. I made myself useful by shutting blinds, holding > doors, etc. I took some candids, but generally, I was an assistant to his > assistant. More milling around, more candids from me and the pro. > > Game time..... camera was put away, and hid behind some screening. My wife > and I were escorted to the ceremony. Son is as cool as a cucumber. Working > pro is doing his thing. The "I do's" got done. Recessional was played, we > got out of the room, to a "holding" area. Back to get official pictures > taken. My camera comes out again, as I get the first shots of the new > couple, glowing. The pro does his job, and we are released to go to the > reception. I did take pictures at the reception. But at that point, I was > too excited to do any good work. I was shot out. > > Film is now all in a bag awaiting processing. I will do this over the next > few days. But there is a big message here. > > What I thought was going to be the real exciting part for photography was > impossible to photograph: The bride's room and the ceremony itself. Why? > Probably more my emotional state during the events ( plus getting into the > bride's rooms would have been dangerous to my life!) What I found much more > rewarding was taking pictures when I could, from where I wanted... during > the rehearsal. I was allowed really free access to locations that even the > pro was not allowed during the ceremony. It was intimate. It was exciting. > No one cared that I had a camera. > > I would recommend that any photographer that wants to shoot his own son or > daughter's wedding take the opportunity to shoot the rehearsal. It is just > plain magical, and you will be the only one there with a camera to record > what is a really special time. > > Techie stuff.... M6TTL with 35 ASPH Lux ( mostly) and 50 Lux and 90 ASPH > Cron for some shots. HP5 and Fuji 800 Press. I did have and use the SF20 > flash when it was just too dark, but that was mainly during the reception, > outside , when light was just too dark otherwise. I shot wide open, mostly > from the dark side. > > Working Pro: Canon Digital SLR with flash and an assistant with a slave > flash. 1 Zoom Lens. Working pro was very nice to me, and seemed very > competent and willing to do what the B+G asked. He shot a lot of pictures, > and worked from 3PM till 11PM, plus was present the day before to look at > the venues and plan shots. I was impressed with his professionalism. > > The important stuff... Tom and Heather were married on April 8, 2006. They > are wonderful adults ( the word kids seems out of place....) with a full > life ahead of them. Wish them luck. > > Frank Filippone