Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Do you recall the open-toed shoes which were a sure sign of "sluttyness" and meant instant suspension? ;-) Walt Jeffery Smith wrote: >This takes me back to my high school days. Back then, if a female wore a >shift, she could be suspended. If she had a belt on, it was okay, but no >belt? Suspended! > >Jeffery Smith >New Orleans, LA >http://www.400tx.com > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org >[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina >Manley >Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 9:14 PM >To: Leica Users Group >Subject: Re: [Leica] Was Foot Washing, Now Abrahamic Faiths > > >At 08:20 PM 4/14/2006, you wrote: > > >>Sorry...didn't finish...What I was trying to say is that I find it >>fascinating that the same people who have no problem calling a Roman >>Catholic Bishop a bigot, or intolerant for adhering to the beliefs of >>his church would no more think of calling bigoted or intolerant Muslim >>cleric who insist that women wear traditional head dress, or Orthodox >>Jews who insist that women dress a certain way. >> >> > >No, I'm an equal opportunity sceptic. I think anybody who insists >that women dress a certain way, except the women themselves, is >bigoted and intolerant. > >Tina > >Tina Manley, ASMP >http://www.tinamanley.com > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > >