Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 1:27 PM -0400 6/15/06, Francis, Michael wrote:
>Doesn't correcting for light fall off imply that the information at the
>periphery of the image will be at a higher effective ISO and hence far
>more noisy than the central part? So unless Leica is able to squeeze
>lower noise out of the sensor (assuming a 1 stop falloff) an ISO 400
>image would only be ISO 400 in the middle and ISO 800 at the periphery
>... and even the Canon's struggle with noise when they are that slow. I
>suspect that new 'digital optimized' lenses will be a requirement for
>high ISO shooting at wide angles. Time will tell and I hope they get it
>right as I'd love to be able to use my M Leica stuff for digital.
>
>Mike
>
>
Yes, you lose dynamic range. You do on the Epson, you will on the DM.
In practice it isn't quite as big a deal as it sounds (at least on
the Epson), and I don't think it will be a killer on the D-M either.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com