Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAW 24 dlridings
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll)
Date: Mon Jun 19 14:41:29 2006

Hi Daniel,

Very good images to test the Tele Elamrit, but in your opini?n how would it
compare with the Summicron 90 M?, I own a T-E and I have the opinion that it
is no so good as it was my Summicron 90 R.

Saludos desde Barcelona
Luis

-----Mensaje original-----
De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de
Daniel Ridings
Enviado el: lunes, 19 de junio de 2006 8:06
Para: Leica Users Group
Asunto: Re: Re: [Leica] PAW 24 dlridings

LNUG = "Leica Nut's ..." :-)

I wanted to try the Tele-Elmarit out in demanding situations. In
almost all of these I was putting the sun behind them, strong back
lighting. I figured if it was going to flare or lose contrast, that
would do it. But it held up.

http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0005.jpg.html
http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0006.jpg.html
http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0007.jpg.html

In the last one I wanted to see if its reputed lack of sharpness at
closest distances was anything I would ever notice. All of these are
only stopped down to f4 and I have another one wide open at 2.8. For
my part, the lack of sharpness at close range is theoretical.

Thanks, Daniel

On 6/19/06, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> Daniel the shot of the young lady (your daughter?)with the pasta dish has
> wonderful light for her complexion and hair. And of course Leica clarity.
> I'm thinking that there should be a sub-set of the LUG, being LNUG.
> Go the nineties!
>
> Cheers
> Hoppy
> Elmarit M 90
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 26
> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:03:44 +0200
> From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW 24 dlridings
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <a2f8f4470606182103i31fac852x359dc490f14a01a3@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Sorry for the confusion, Jim.
>
> The link I posted was to a photo I took with the 50. But right next to
> that one in the shoebox are the ones that were taken with the 90.
>
> 06v24-0005, 0006, 0007 and 0008
>
> Starting here:
> http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v24/06v24-0005.jpg.html
>
> Daniel
>
> On 6/18/06, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > Daniel,
> >
> > That is another great shot of your wife.  You mention 90s in your post,
> but
> > your blog says its a 50.  Which is it?  Either way, the results are
great.
> >
> > Jim Nichols
> > Tullahoma, TN USA
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] PAW 24 dlridings)