Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: D-23
From: vintagebill at verizon.net (bill harting)
Date: Mon Jun 26 14:14:51 2006
References: <200606260915.k5Q9F7Gs015345@server1.waverley.reid.org> <93dd4e67507ff96b11e7aef3c4c3da7c@optonline.net>

I mixed up a batch yesterday, Larry.

Bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lawrence Zeitlin" <lrzeitlin@optonline.net>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:29 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re: D-23


> 
> On Jun 26, 2006, at 5:15 AM, Jeffery wrote:
> 
>> I hate to say it, but 777 is besting my old tried and true D76. The 
>> results
>> look more like D23 to me, but better. I am hoping that Greg Lorenzo 
>> will
>> drive on down to Frugal Photographer, buy a bag of this stuff, and 
>> give it a
>> whirl.
> 
> Does anyone still use D-23? I recall that it was one of the favorites 
> of Ansel Adams. When I mixed my own chemicals, it used to be one of my 
> favorites as well because it only had two ingredients other than water. 
> I guess I've been spoiled by the relative convenience of HC 110 and the 
> ultimate convenience of digital.
> 
> Larry Z
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: D-23)