Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2006-06-29-16:10:17 Brian Reid:
> I have a good friend whose only criterion for judging quality of
> photographs is how well the skin tones are rendered on people who are not
> Caucasian. Identity is race, race is skin color, and so the capture of a
> person's identity (and hence the quality of the photograph) is entirely
> determined by how accurately it renders the skin color. Nothing else
> matters.
To choose a single arbitrary technical criterion like that and try to
put it in more Luggish terms, how about...
- The quality of a picture is strongly correlated with the sharpness
of focus of the near pupil of the primary human subject.
While such a singleminded, purely-technical rule is clearly absurd as
the sole means of judging photos, I must admit that when I'm editing (so
the whole available universe of pictures to choose from has already been
filtered through my compositional sense and seat-of-the-pants feel for
the right moment to push that damned button), an awful lot of pictures
seem to get to live or die based on the above rule.
Discuss.