Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:09 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > Lottermoser George writes in part: > > >> In an attempt to help us all avoid creating and posting "mediocre" >> photographs; can we develop a group consensus on what constitutes a >> mediocre photograph? (sometimes we post images which are simply >> interesting visual notes of situations and I believe not intended >> to be seen as anything more - I'm not dicussing about those). >> > > LOL!! > > After we agree on what makes a great photo (might take the Lug > collective a day or so) we can then solve that problem of some art > being mediocre art and then move on to deciding which political > philosopy we should ascribe to! > > On the other hand, never mind... I don't think it can be done. > > Regards, > > Greg > For a start - Pictures of: Cute kids doing cute things. Kittens, no matter how cute. Landscapes without clouds. Anything taken with a 15 mm lens. Car racing scenes without cars. Cars racing without crashes. Any picture of New York crowds. Family celebrations where everyone is looking at the camera. Flowers, flowers, flowers. Seascapes. Photos including the photographer's feet. Most of my pictures of any topic. Larry Z