Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, DPReview has said that Leica has now officially announced the
M8, posted pictures and spec so there's no point in being quiet any
more.
Tom Abrahamsson got hold of an M8 about a month ago, and shortly
after let me use it for about 10 days so that I could evaluate it and
do a write up.
Firmware version was 0.23 so final image quality and some electronic
operational items are certainly going to be different than what I got
to use. Reasonably, I was asked not to post pictures from this
camera. Various family members have gotten prints from it, but they
really couldn't care much about which camera they came from. I took
about 1600 pictures.
I had a couple of interesting moments w.r.t. other people's
reactions. A couple of times while walking around downtown someone
came up and said 'nice camera' while sporting their own late model
Leica's. I slipped my fingers over the 'M8' logo and held the camera
back against my body, went into grumpy mode, grunted and walked past.
Then we had a gathering at our house, and among others the neighbours
were there. A friend of their son came to our door, asking for
Christoph; I let him in and he saw the M8 on the counter and
immediately oohed and aahed. Turn's out he's a photographer and while
born in Vancouver now lives over the LeicaShop in Vienna. After that
I 'disguised' it, but it still was recognized at times.
So - the camera. It handles like an M, except your hands miss the
grip that the wind level gave you. The extra thickness is easy to get
used to, and the responsiveness is very good. Because of the firmware
issue, the testing I did on it is meaningless, but there was nothing
negative to my perception. The shutter, while certainly different
than the rubber-curtained one on the film camera, is not particularly
loud, either in firing or winding. I think the dampening they did on
the transplanted R9 shutter had some effect. It doesn't have a high
frame rate, but neither do the film M's and that's not important to
me. The shutter travel includes a detent for locking the exposure
that was a bit hard to find, but a lot better with one of Tom's
softies.
The covering is fine grained and a bit too slippery, especially since
I missed the wind lever for holding the camera with the right hand.
Some kind of molded bump like on the Hexar RF would be nice, but I'm
not sure right now how that could be implemented in line with the
desire to retain the 'classic' look.
Frame lines were bright and useable, and came up in the pairs that
you would expect due to the traditional lens mount activation. The
frame for the 24 is reasonably visible with glasses. It works with
the Visoflex III, and it worked fine on the Aristophot I got
recently, and I shot some pictures with the various Photars. I also
put on my 17mm fisheye, and it looks like this:
http://www.archiphoto.com/Various/Incognito.jpg
All lenses that I tried, including 12, 15 and 21 CV; 21, 35/1.4, 50
and 90 ASPH, and older 35/2, new 50/2.8, 50/1, 75/1.4 and 135/4
worked, and worked well. I wouldn't hesitate to use any of them and
there was no vignetting that wasn't visible on film as well. Those
angled microlenses do their job, and erase one of the main objections
I had re the RD-1, which was really not useable with lenses beyond
the range of 24 to (slow) 75. Image quality was outstanding in
general, the best were easily on a par or, in the case of wideangle
shots, readily exceeded that of the best on the Canon 5D. My
favourite lenses on the M8 were the 21 and 35/1.4 ASPH and 75/1.4,
but I wouldn't hesitate to use any lens.
Menus were fine, and quite direct. There is no 'dedicated' button for
ISO (full stops from 160 to 2500), but since you can get at two
different menus by pushing two different buttons, changing ISO's was
very fast and efficient. There are also good user parameter save
options, so after you set them up you can go from low ISO with -1/3
compensation, colour, colour histogram, bright LCD screen, high
resolution with DNG and fine jpeg with medium sharpening and low
saturation to high ISO, not compensation, B&W, dim LCD screen and
regular jpeg with higher sharpening in a very few button pushes. The
dial that's concentric with the arrow pad is also very nice and works
well.
The little door to the left of the screen just has a connector for a
dedicated cable, which I didn't have so don't know whether it's USB2
or 1394.
Mainly, it felt like an M, and within a couple of minutes of picking
it up you could shoot with it like an M, and except for the sound,
lack of winding and having more than 36 shots, it really wasn't
different than an M.
And that's good.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com