Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Colin J offered: Subject: [Leica] Re: New Leica varifinder is rather huge > David, > > The new finder is too huge and I predict it will be major disincentive for > buyers of the new wide angle Tri-Elmar. > > If using the new Tri-Elmar with the M8, you can use the much more compact > current finder 21-24-28mm. This gives the exact angle of view for the > 16-18-21mm Tri-Elmar on the M8. > > But this solution does not work for the M film bodies. You could use > separate finders for the focal lengths 16mm (Contax available) and 21mm > (Leica, Voigtlander, Zeiss Ikon, Contax available) but I do not know of an > 18mm finder.<<<<< Hi Colin, >You could use separate finders for the focal lengths 16mm (Contax >available) and 21mm (Leica, Voigtlander, Zeiss Ikon, Contax available) but >I do not know of an 18mm finder.< As far as a separate finder for an 18mm lens on the M8 it's never so accurate as looking through an SLR. Not that they are absolutely 100% perfect either, well some maybe. And for a couple of mm's on either side of 18mm one makes it KISS simple....... you wing it with either the 21mm or 16mm or 15mm. I sure as heck wouldn't get concerned about how accurate the view finder was in this case. Besides I nearly choked on the "monster" of a tri-Elmar viewfinder!!!! I can't imagine such a piece of equipment sticking up that wouldn't sooner or later get smashed, bent or broken off during an assignment.Idiocy of design! Probably fine on a work bench! In the field of shooting locations?????????? ted