Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, generally these days I'd say that when people are talking about "digital capture," they mean capturing the image in the camera, not transferring the image from one medium to another. On 10/2/06 3:18 PM, "Robert Meier" <robertmeier@usjet.net> wrote: > B.D. -- He was comparing digital capture, just not the kind of digital > capture you're talking about. R. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "B. D. Colen" <bd@bdcolenphoto.com> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:03 PM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Bryn Mawr, PA > > >> I'm sure you realize, Phil, that the fact that your scans of your slides >> aren't up to the quality you see in your slides doesn't prove anything - >> except that your 4490 scanner (hardly the be-all and end-all in scanning) >> combined with your scanning skills can't produce scans that are the same >> as >> what your eyes see in the slides. Before you can say that the "50 year old >> technology still trumps digital capture," perhaps you should compare >> digital >> capture to the 50-year-old technology - because, of course, there is >> nothing >> in your post about digital capture: >> Put a full-frame digital SLR - say the Canon EOS1DS MkII on a tripod, next >> to whatever film camera you're taking. Shoot the same scene, with the same >> lens, and equivalent exposures - after you've calibrated for the camera's >> sensor, make adjustments in Photoshop, because of course you'll be >> shooting >> RAW and the image will need sharpening and the same kind of contrast >> adjustment the film gives the scene, and then begin to make comparisons. >> >> It's great that you're happy with the "50 year-old-technology;" but >> please, >> let's talk real comparisons if you're going to make comparisons. ;-) >> >> >> On 10/2/06 2:47 PM, "Philip Forrest" <photo.forrest@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >>> Here are a few scans of some Velvia 100 I shot out in Bryn Mawr, PA >>> earlier >>> this spring with Jim Shulman. My Epson 4490 just doesn't have the >>> dynamic >>> range of the chromes themselves. I would have to do multiple scans >>> weighted >>> towards each color channel in order to get the incredible amount of >>> saturation that the film shows. One more reason why 50 year old >>> technology >>> still trumps digital capture. Not that I don't like digital, I just >>> don't >>> love it like my Velvia. >>> >>> >>> >>> http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/PForrest/BrynMawr_04E.jpg >>> >>> http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/PForrest/BrynMawr_03E.jpg >>> >>> http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/PForrest/BrynMawr_02E.jpg >>> >>> http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/PForrest/BrynMawr_01E.jpg >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information