Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Expensive Cameras in Checked Luggage
From: snasta at microassist.net (Sanjay Nasta)
Date: Sun Oct 15 07:08:28 2006
References: <200610142134.k9ELVDEn070760@server1.waverley.reid.org>

An interesting post from Bruce Schneier's security newsletter.

This is a blog post about the problems of being forced to check
expensive camera equipment on airplanes:

"Well, having lived in Kashmir for 12+ years I am well accustomed to
this type of security. We haven't been able to have hand carries since
1990. We also cannot have batteries in any of our equipment checked or
otherwise. At least we have been able to carry our laptops on and
recently been able to actually use them (with the batteries). But, if
things keep moving in this direction, and I'm sure it will, we need to
start thinking now about checking our cameras and computers and how to
do it safely. This is a very unpleasant idea. Two years ago I ordered a
Canon 20D and had it "hand carried" over to meet me in England by a
friend. My friend put it in their checked bag. The bag never showed up.
She did not have insurance and all I got $100 from British Airways for
the camera and $500 from American Express (buyers protection) that was
it. So now it looks as if we are going to have to check our cameras and
our computers involuntarily. OK here are a few thoughts."

Pretty basic stuff, and we all know about the risks of putting expensive
stuff in your checked luggage.

The interesting part is one of the blog comments, about halfway down.
Another photographer wonders if the TSA rules for firearms could be
extended to camera equipment:

"Why not just have the TSA adopt the same check in rules for
photographic and video equipment as they do for firearms?

"All firearms must be in checked baggage, no carry on.

"All firearms must be transported in a locked, hard sided case using a
non-TSA approved lock. This is to prevent anyone from opening the case
after its been screened.

"After bringing the equipment to the airline counter and declaring and
showing the contents to the airline representative, you take it over to
the TSA screening area where it is checked by a screener, relocked in
front of you, your key or keys returned to you (if it's not a
combination lock) and put directly on the conveyor belt for loading onto
the plane.

"No markings, stickers or labels identifying what's inside are put on
the outside of the case or, if packed inside something else, the bag.

"Might this solve the problem? I've never lost a firearm when flying."

Then someone has the brilliant suggestion of putting a firearm in your
camera-equipment case:

"A 'weapons' is defined as a rifle, shotgun, pistol, airgun, and STARTER
PISTOL. Yes, starter pistols -- those little guns that fire blanks at
track and swim meets -- are considered weapons...and do NOT have to be
registered in any state in the United States.

"I have a starter pistol for all my cases. All I have to do upon
check-in is tell the airline ticket agent that I have a weapon to
declare...I'm given a little card to sign, the card is put in the case,
the case is given to a TSA official who takes my key and locks the case,
and gives my key back to me.

"That's the procedure. The case is extra-tracked...TSA does not want to
lose a weapons case. This reduces the chance of the case being lost to
virtually zero.

"It's a great way to travel with camera gear...I've been doing this
since Dec 2001 and have had no problems whatsoever."

I have to admit that I am impressed with this solution.


MicroAssist, Inc.
3420 Executive Center Drive, Suite G100 Austin, TX 78731 
http://www.microassist.net
Phone: (512) 794-8440
Fax: (512) 794-8742


Replies: Reply from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Expensive Cameras in Checked Luggage)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Expensive Cameras in Checked Luggage)