Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gun owners should be lined up against a wall and shot. Buzz On 10/19/06 7:38 PM, "Philip Forrest" <photo.forrest@earthlink.net> wrote: > I think that owning an assault rifle for home defense is impractical, yes. > However, if one believes in protecting oneself, family and property, law > enforcement doesn't do that for you. There is no reason that a law abiding > citizen cannot responsibly own and use a firearm of any type (small arms > here, not artillery pieces & the like.) I love target shooting and though > I > don't know if it should be considered a "sport" it certainly requires great > discipline and training to be able to consistently and accurately place > shots on target. It's just a step below golf in it's level of discipline > and ability, but much the same when it comes to the final goal. > Fear is what drives irrational decisions. A gun will not shoot itself, we > all know this. The only way a firearm will do what it's supposed to is if > a > person operating it makes it work. Fear is what needs to be overcome by > people who don't know anything about firearms. They should be shown that a > firearm is just a tool, the same way that a torque wrench is a tool. They > have very specific purposes, but both are tools nonetheless. > I have no problem with people who don't like guns, but for rational > reasons. > Anti-gun folks need to come up with real and equitable solutions to the > problems they have that will WORK. There will never be a United States > where firearm ownership is not a right, so that side of the gun argument > needs to come up with a realistic solution to the problems they have with > firearms. The AWB proved that gun violence did not decrease during the 10 > years it was effective. 10 rounds in the magazine or 100 rounds, it > doesn't > matter. Assault weapons are used in so few crimes as to be a blip on the > radar in comparison to the gun related crimes committed with Raven .25's or > other cheap guns. The average assault weapon starts at about $600. Few if > any criminals are going to be willing to put that kind of money into a > firearm when they could get a cheap pistol for $30. > The only way that crime with firearms is to be quelled is by large scale > changes in society. People need to be educated about firearms, the law and > how with a lot of cooperation, we can turn the gun related violence around. > Many parents view themselves as responsible when teaching their children > about sex, birth control and parenting, right? (not as many as need to be > though) Why wouldn't someone want to teach a person how to properly and > safely handle a firearm? We teach people how to safely drive cars every > day. Still the vehicular fatality statistics in this country are several > times the gun related fatality numbers. > The last issue I don't like is the anti-gun group playing upon that very > fear and lack of knowledge by saying things like "...it might go off. Six > blocks away someone's family member could be holding their insides in their > hands.." This little bit of editorial journalism is just what people like > myself don't want to read or hear. It uses that fear of the unknowing to > suggest that there is a gun (not artillery) that a person could buy these > days, shoot, and eviscerate an innocent person a half mile away. Yes, > people do get shot from stray rounds landing through their windows and > roofs. This is an amazingly small number of people. Most wounds are > superficial. And surely, there is not a small arm available to the public > at this time that could do such a thing. Most small arms up to and > including the .50 cal BMG only produce small, oblong holes at their > tumbling > worst. I'm not condoning any of this, of course. I don't support gun > related violence or the wounding of innocent people at all, I'm just saying > that a bit of exaggeration, or a lot, is not a good thing when it comes to > this topic. > OK, I've written far too much for sure. > > Philip