Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you very much for looking and commenting, David... and I'm pleased my pictures were there for the after-calibration test. Despite comments (about various pictures at various times) that suggest the contrary, I find scanning prints to be easier than negatives. Perhaps I'm just more confident of my darkroom skills (such as they are). And thank you also to others who commented, or looked. Bill David Rodgers wrote: > Bill, > > These images look exceptional. > > I recently calibrated my LCD monitor for the first time (using a > Spyder2). I hadn't done so on this machine before because I don't use it > for imaging. What a mistake on my part. Calibration seems to have made a > big difference in how images look even in a browser. I've seen some of > these images before. They look even better this time around. Nice job of > scanning, too. > > daveR > > -----Original Message----- > From: bill harting [mailto:vintagebill@verizon.net] > Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 2:38 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: [Leica] Picture of concentration > > Four more pictures from recent weeks, 2 Boston scenics with the 21, a > bucolic shot of a place about to be improved by development, and a > picture of concentration. M or Widelux, all TriX at 800, Scanned from > prints. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Shutter-to-think/album343/Summer+st.jpg > .html > > and the next three frames. > > Any comment is appreciated. Have a look. > > Bill h > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >