Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 10/25/06, Steve Unsworth <lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> wrote: > When I bought my M6 I could have bought a Canon SLR with lens for > about a third of the price - probably less. The Canon usd exactly the > same film as the Leica. So why did I spend all that money on a > rangefinder rather than an SLR. Well, the main reason was because it > was a rangefinder rather than an SLR. That was the case in film days > and it's the same in the digital age. > > Steve I'm not saying that the M8 will flop, that no one will buy it, or that it's even a camera I wouldn't like to own. I'm saying that it won't change Leica's stars. Even in the M6 days, you were party of a tiny minority, right? 1 Leica sold for every 100 good Canon bodies. That's no different today - a Leica M8 is simply too expensive to ignite any kind of renaissance for the company. There just aren't that many people who can afford to pay $4800+tax for a single body. Those few with the disposable income and need or desire to buy one will, and everyone else will buy a Canon/Nikon dSLR or wait for the next Cosina digital rangefinder at a price competitive with dSLRs. -- MP wooderson@gmail.com