Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm told they are due in Australia in 2 weeks and hope to have a fondle then ;-) On 27/10/2006, at 12:03, G Hopkinson wrote: > Thanks Greg, yes of course I was aware of the LUG reviews/previews. > I do recall Henning posting a single small image, not related to > his review. I haven't seen any other publicly available images. But > then, since B.D. has now mentioned that he has had a visit from > Ted, perhaps he's seen hundreds? ;-) > It does sound as though the Reid Review is very informative. I > haven't seen it. As mentioned it appears that Leica asked that images > from those preview examples not be published in that the firmware > was not the production version. I don't recall any content > specifically commenting on very high ISO performance. I shall re- > read the reviews. In any event, I have no idea except what has been > shared with us. I was asking about where the comparison had been > done vs the Canon performance. > Howard in Hong Kong has just posted that his experience was that > the camera's performance was spectacular at 1250 ISO. That is a > marvel and shows some huge potential for that low light creativity > that many Leica users love. I am certainly looking forward to > early owners sharing their pictures and experiences with us all. I > thought that the on-line reviews that we have seen were certainly > intellectually honest and also very interesting to us all. I hope > you don't consider that I've made uninformed, idle speculation > regarding the camera's performance. Certainly I've never handled > one. I do hope to be shown one of the early deliveries ordered in > Australia, maybe early in 2007. I suspect that handling one may be > very bad indeed for the wallet. > Cheers > Hoppy > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of > GREG LORENZO > Sent: Friday, 27 October 2006 11:32 > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: RE: [Leica] M8 and the Future > > G Hopkinson writes in part: > >> B.D., I follow your observations on this and would like to add >> some questions and comments. >> Where are the review images located that you have used to compare >> the high ISO performance? >> I have only read reviews thus far based on pre-production >> examples. Those reviewers, quite properly, have refrained from >> posting >> images, commenting that the firmware is not the commercial release. > > Hoppy, > > A quick check of recent Lug archives should bring up some reviews > from List members who have actually seen, handled, used an M8, and > produced images with it. Tom A., Henning and Howard C come to mind. > > Henning, I believe, actually posted an on-line photo. > > Although these three have posted their subjective opinions and > impressions there have not been a lot of publicly available image > results to see for yourself. > > That said, I tend to believe that our on-List reviewers have posted > their opinions subsequent to actual usage... which is > intellectually more honest then uninformed, idle speculation. > > Regards, > > Greg > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information