Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 2500 ISO
From: dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Tue Nov 7 06:09:32 2006
References: <00c401c70155$4d761260$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <454EB466.3090205@eth.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20061106070325.024ecdb0@infoave.net> <454FDF93.7050900@eth.net> <454FFF5C.4090101@waltjohnson.com> <001101c70227$c5ba4ed0$a302a8c0@ted> <45509168.7000601@waltjohnson.com>
Walt Johnson wrote:
> I will say if images are your end goal a Pentax
> K1000 in the right hands would produce what you need. :-)
Let's be kind to the humble Pentax. Even today I can appreciate pulling
out an MZ-3 (autofocus). Small bodies, go click and do their thing. Not
very sexy though.
Daniel
Replies:
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)