Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] three...
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed Nov 8 16:48:10 2006
 
either in spite of, or because of,  its faults.... I like this image...

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/three.jpg.html


I just go by my gut, but I'm wondering if others more  
photographically inclined may have helpful comments...

thanks for looking,

and your thoughts,

Steve
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] three...)
Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] three...)
Reply from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] three...)
Reply from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] three...)
Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] three...)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] three...)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] three...)