[Leica] Luminosity

[len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)]

I'm going to vote in the other direction. If you open both bridge  
photos and compare them directly, you see the Ektar25 color is a  
little brighter and more pastel in tone. The Kodachrome has deeper  
and more natural color. If you compare the two folders, the Ektar25  
folder is more forward with the bright red and orange colors. I like  
the Ektar photos better but the Kodachrome colors better. In any case  
these are fantastic fall images. Well done.

Len


On Nov 8, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote:

> I don't know..., but for me Ektar looks better
>
> Saludos desde Barcelona
> Luis
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En  
> nombre de
> Jim Hemenway
> Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 08 de noviembre de 2006 21:55
> Para: LUG
> Asunto: [Leica] Luminosity
>
> I hope that you'll like the luminosity in most of these taken with my
> spare R8 prior to selling it to a member of this group:
> http://www.half-fast.com//R8-Ektar25-Oct9-13-2006/
> Ektar 25 color negative film
>
> As a comparison, these (posted earlier) were taken about the same time
> with Kodachrome 200 in a Pentax MX:
> http://www.half-fast.com/MX-Kodachrome-Oct8-10-2006/
>
> I've been told by someone on the Kodachrome list that Kodak High
> Resolution" film is actually Ektar 400... can anyone here confirm?
>
> Comments are cheerfully accepted!
>
> Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information