Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sonny Very well spoken. SonC@aol.com wrote: > > >In a message dated 11/13/2006 6:31:27 P.M. Central Standard Time, >hoppyman@bigpond.net.au writes: > >last month there was discussion where some LUGgers thought we should >critique the entries, while anonymous. This was to improve >our photo skills. > > >----------------- > >It is a good idea, but the real problem here is that one cannot look at the > >photo being criticized, and I do not have a good enough memory to agree or >disagree. > >Even after 50 years of photography, I do not feel comfortable criting >shots. I can tell people that I like or dislike their stuff, but I cannot >make >any valuable comments to help them improve their work. > >My experience is that in the several years I have been posting that maybe >forty out of several hundred postings received legitimate critiques. I >like a >pat on the back as much as anyone, but I don't post for that. I post >because >it keeps me out there shooting. That is the benefit. > > >Regards, >Sonny >http://www.sonc.com >Natchitoches, Louisiana >Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane >?galit?, libert?, crawfish > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >