Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I was discussing KEH ratings with my shop owner today. We got into this discussion because he uses KEH as the photo Blue Book during our negotiations. He had KEH people come to his shop a while back to appraise his used stock. He said their appraiser was very tough. And his stuff is very nice. Len On Nov 16, 2006, at 11:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote: > They are very generous to the customer in this regard, but do take > into > account the age of the camera. Thus, an Ex+ Leica lens made within > the past > 10 years will be like new, but an Ex+ Rolleiflex from 1955 won't be > quite so > pristine. But I have never gotten anything from them that was lower > than > their rating. I bought some Pentax 42 screwmount Takumars that look > like > they were made yesterday. > > And if you aren't satisfied, you can return it for a refund. > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA > http://www.400tx.com > http://400tx.blogspot.com/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Philippe > Orlent > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:26 PM > To: LUG Group > Subject: [Leica] KEH > > > Are their descriptions and ratings for 2nd hand items trusteable? > > Thanks, > Philippe > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information