Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello Dave, I disagree. It is too soon to call the M8 a failure. Give Leica some time to work on the issues. Funny, my wife who doesn't know much about cameras but has a great eye, looked at the results out of the M8 and said, "Keep the camera!". I have shot with the R-D1 for the last two years, and while I love that camera, the M8 is a big improvement over it in many areas. I'm looking forward to reading and responding to your manifesto! ;-) Regards, Larry >How Leica handles the resulting anger and >apprehension will probably determine the M8's success or failure. As a former owner of an M8, I maintain that the M8 is already a failure. Some diehards will buy it, some will buy it because they want the latest expensive camera jewelery around their neck, but serious M photographers will ultimately shun it. All the claptrap that I read about the M8 being "a real M camera" is just that, claptrap. It may walk like a duck but it doesn't quack like one. Shades of the M5... This not from some old fart, film traditionalist either. I longed for a digital M but it's back to film and, when appropriate, my now much more highly appreciated R-D1. This will be expounded apon in my upcoming "M8 Manifesto". Dave.