Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Because Pop Photo did it in the past does not absolve other sites doing it now, short memory or otherwise...Would you rather this sort of information stays unreported? Or just have gushing reviews for products one is emotionally attached to? Or is it better to read all possible views, and then make up your own mind? Cheers Jayanand Henning Wulff wrote: > At 7:58 AM -0800 11/18/06, Frank Filippone wrote: > >> This is by far the most damaging article on the subject. The PR guy >> at Leica blew it.....after the Engineers at leica blew >> it,.........the Management at Leica blew it. >> >> Remember the Intel bad math Pentium? >> You can get more goodwill with how you handle a problem than if you >> had not created a problem to begin with..... >> >> Frank Filippone >> red735i@earthlink.net >> >> http://www.popphoto.com/popularphotographyfeatures/3403/marooned-leica-lovers.html >> >> >> or >> >> http://tinyurl.com/y7dfkg > > > Pop photo seems to have a rather short memory. I remember them stating > some years back that they receive many more products to test than they > print, and they base some of their decisions on what to print by not > posting products that fail their tests. If they then get a better > sample and retest it, they print it. This, by their own admission. Now > they castigate dpreview and luminous landscape for doing essentially > the same thing. >