Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Neopan 400
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Tue Nov 28 08:13:42 2006
References: <200611280002.kAS02JbZ014999@server1.waverley.reid.org> <001601c7128c$ef5f2560$6501a8c0@asus930> <200611280512.kAS5Cnj3028053@server1.waverley.reid.org> <456C4F65.6090005@mcclary.net>
 
Didn't we all? Also, like everything else in America the recent Neopan 
is supposed to be new and improved. Never shot it myself but ordered a 
few rolls from B&H just to see.

Walt

Harrison McClary wrote:

> Marc James Small wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> So, if you find Neopan friendly to your needs, I apologize.  I simply 
>> find it an unworkable film with little apparent benefit and much 
>> difficulty.  Perhaps I ought to try it again.
>
>
> Marc,
>
> I have found Neopan 400 to be a very nice B&W film.  I like the look 
> it gives when souped in HC110.  But then I am an old newsie who 
> learned to develop his B&W in hot HC110 on deadlines...I like grain 
> and high contrast.
>
In reply to: Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] First test Summicron Collapsible)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] First test Summicron Collapsible)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Neopan 400)
Message from harrison at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Neopan 400)