Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Spring half frame
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Fri Dec 1 18:35:17 2006
References: <200612012115.kB1LF7xa069838@server1.waverley.reid.org> <6F657895-9E37-4E45-A7C6-58E7F5936742@optonline.net> <4570DD67.2040202@waltjohnson.com> <001901c715b8$f5442c80$a302a8c0@ted>
 
 From what I've seen yours is better than mine and B.D.'s :-)

Ted Grant wrote:

> Walt Johnson offered:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Spring half frame
>
>
>> You are absolutely right, the Canon Dial....It's been 40 years so my 
>> memory might be getting a bit like B.D.'s. :-) <<<
>
>
> Oh jeeeesh thank you, thank you Walt!!! At least you didn't say mine! ;-)
>
> ted
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Spring half frame)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Re: Spring half frame)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Re: Spring half frame)