Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>This is a photograph that I already showed exactly as below here. I >shot it on Fuji NPS160, with professional development, but had it >scanned commerially on low res: all flattened out. > >http://tinyurl.com/y4o8pq >or bigger: >http://tinyurl.com/tbwgw > > > >This is the same shot after I let Alien Skin (and some minor >additional PS alterations) have a go at the original scan today: > >as big as above: >http://tinyurl.com/y373rf > >!!! the big ones are in Adobe RGB !!! > >Isn't the 2nd one much more distinctive and doesn't it have a lot >more character? Or am I just overenthousiastic? > >Philippe Hi Philippe, The plug in just seems to increase contrast, throw a lot of the extended tonal range away and skew the colours to introduce a cast. This is usually what I fight to get rid of when scanning. Film, properly printed lets me get a huge tonal range and a good printer was always able to handle the colours properly. My scans, even with a fairly good scanner, are usually limited in comparison to projected slides or a good print. I'm sorry, but the first image, while not necessarily optimized, allows all sorts of interpretations, but the second looks like a poor scan. It is a 'film' look, but one that mimics something I try to avoid - not always successfully. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com