Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted, points well taken. And in that spirit, let me present a few alternate versions, "special for you." You may be right that #2 is better, but I like the way the shadows lead to the subjects in #1, so I used it for illustrations. Here's what the camera saw: <http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/temp/IrishOrig.jpg> Here's what I thought I saw: <http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/temp/IrishGradient.jpg> Here's what Ted thinks I saw: :-) <http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/temp/IrishDesat.jpg> Here's a "Wizard of Oz" approach to emphasizing the subjects: <http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/temp/IrishDesat2.jpg> And here's a B&W with the digital equivalent of burning in the street: <http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/temp/IrishBWGrad.jpg> These are the result of quick and dirty edits, most of them violate the Nathan Wajsman Ethical Guidelines for Image Editing (which I normally adhere to), and all would probably get me fired from the Charlotte Observer, if I worked there, which I don't. And it was fun. . . Now, do any of these work? And then, I'll get back to some probably better images. --Peter > Peter my friend, > The operative word here is..... "Snapped "!!!!!! :-( a file13 compared to your regular photographs. > We have all done this kind of quick re-action snap picture thing where no matter what we try to do with it after the fact it really and truly just doesn't work.:-( File 13 ! > It's a kind of "re-action to colour" more than content even though both are influencing your "seeing senses." The colour grabbed your eye and "click!":-( > Your #2 crop is better because it allows the viewer to see into the bar behind to the right, seems to make it balance slightly better. But even here the people walking on the left are so distracting due to the lighting they draw the eyes away from what should be two or one bright green person. > On the left there are two men with a slight separation between, one white shirt, one plaid, if you crop right through there & get rid of everything to the left it helps because you get rid of the white eye catching shirt and the guys white hair! Or burn it down to a less distracting level. Then the man walking toward you, dark shirt and glasses needs to be burnt down also. > But honestly it's a hell of a lot work trying to make something out of a "grab shot" better left un-exposed as we see it here. Or at least as you presented, "it ain't no yellow brick road." > If I were to have posted it I think I might have asked something like... "OK what are all the things wrong with this photo?" Or "What are all the things that could've been done to make it better?" > Either of those questions I'm sure would've evoked a great deal of interesting descriptions. :-) > A last minute thought... maybe in B&W it might have worked better because you relate to the shadows, "I really like the way the shadows point to the subjects in #1." > No offence intended as you know. ted