Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]bummer. no competition. I was hoping the M8 would at least come close. Eric On 12/6/06, Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote: > > You can not tell the falloff from these images.....there is a single light > source, therefore there IS falloff. Square law or > something like that. > > You need a constant lighted source to tell falloff... properly illuminated > wall, piece of sky, etc. > > I do not care what kind or size of chip is inside..... the resultant > comparative image is the issue ( somewhat paraphrasing AA). > Your customer ( even if it is your wife/husband/yourself....) does not > care. Little Dora Sue looks better to her in the Canon > image. > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net > > > Apples and oranges completely. But you are comparing a FF CMOS chip to a > non FF CCD chip. The Canon 24/1.4 looks like it has allot > of falloff on the edges, even at 5.6. > > Of course seeing it on a screen and seeing in print are another story. > > Chris > > ----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >