Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 11:24 AM 12/6/2006, you wrote: >Nothing outperforms, concerning noise, the EOS >5D, not even the 1Ds mkII that may be better in >other image quality aspects but not in noise. >The /raison d'?tre/ of the Leica M8 is not >getting the *best* digital image quality >available but getting pictures from a >rangefinder with the legendary Leica M lenses. >In few words it is not the best digital camera >in the world but an outsanding Leica M digital >camera. I'm anxiously awaiting mine. > >Regards. > >F?lix. I agree totally, Felix. I did the experiments hoping that I would be able to use the M8 in some low light situations. That's where my M7's and 6's shine with very fast lenses. Now I know I'll be able to use my M8's with fast lenses but only at 360 ISO and above. I was surprised that the results were so noisy when the 2500 ISO that I took with the loaner M8 is not: http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/69803984 I did run that one through Noise Ninja, but not even Noise Ninja helped the inside shots much. Looks like I'll be using both the Canons and the Leica for most jobs :-( Tina Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA http://www.tinamanley.com