Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: High ISOs Comparison
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Wed Dec 6 12:18:49 2006
References: <4cfa589b0612060937n10144186jd0dc9d7663f8ef08@mail.gmail.com> <005b01c71971$1798fed0$6401a8c0@FrankDell2>
 
At 02:59 PM 12/6/2006, you wrote:
>Of course, that is the purpose of the Noctilux, the other 
>0.00000001% of the time..... .... I think the football analogy is a Hail
>Mary......
>
>Frank Filippone

O.K.  I tried the Noctilux and I also tried Doug's suggestion of 
underexposing at a lower ISO.  That shows real promise.  Here are the 
Noctilux results:

http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/comparison  Go to Page 2.

Tina

Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
http://www.tinamanley.com
Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: High ISOs Comparison)
 In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Re: High ISOs Comparison)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re: High ISOs Comparison)