Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I haven't had a chance to put mine through any use at all yet. But I'll try it at 800 tomorrow morning just to see how it fares noise-wise. Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com http://400tx.blogspot.com/ -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Digiratidoc@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:16 PM To: lug@leica-users.org Subject: Re: [Leica] K10d shake reduction I'm thinking of getting the 10D and I've played with it at my local camera store. The samples I got at high ISO's of 400 to 1600 were in my eyes *better* than the shots I get with my F30. Less noise, more detail, etc. probably due to the fact that we're comparing the APS-C sized sensor in the 10D with a sensor smaller than your fingernail like the one in the Fuji F30. Fuji has performed miracles with their point and shoot cameras but I would have no hesitation at all about shooting the 10D at 800 or 1600 ISO. In a message dated 12/12/06 8:30:39 P.M. Central Standard Time, jsmith342@cox.net writes: >the achilles heel of shake reduction is that it does *dick* for >subjects that are moving (as your pic here shows). So it is no better >in low light than a tripod-bound camera. If the subject moves at 1/30, >you will have a sharp background and a fuzzy person. >Now, if Pentax would combine SR with a sensor like Fuji's, that would >be nice. >Jeffery Smith >New Orleans, LA >http://www.400tx.com >http://400tx.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information