Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Another Comparison
From: stephen.s1 at comcast.net (Stephen Syrotiak)
Date: Wed Dec 20 07:39:56 2006
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20061220093138.0257c598@infoave.net>

After the fact, but I'd love to have seen the Leica shot with another  
lens.

Looks like short dynamic range/over exposure...  compounded with poor  
WB.

This result is almost, almost, enough to make me cancel my order for  
the M8.  Geeze, I hate to say that!

Stephen.


On Dec 20, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Tina Manley wrote:

> People who are interested in the M8:
>
> I'm still doing comparisons. Yesterday photographing a Hanukkah  
> celebration, I used both the 5D and the M8.  The 5D had the 85/1.2  
> lens, I set it at 800 ISO and used automatic focus.  The M8 had the  
> 75/1.4, I set it at 160 ISO and minus 2 exposure and manual focus.   
> They were both converted in SilkyPix using automatic white balance  
> and exposure compensation.  What is going on with the candle flames  
> in the Leica photo?  Is it just a difference in depth of field?   
> Did I miss the focus slightly?
>
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/m85d
>
> I would love to get to the point where I could carry just the M8  
> but I'm definitely not there yet!
>
> Tina
>
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
> http://www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Another Comparison)
In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Another Comparison)