Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M5 - what to look for - was M4 variants
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sun Dec 24 15:22:45 2006

Well, it was something like that. I just put a new battery in my M5 and
stuck the 50/1.2 Hexanon on it. Hoping there is something to shoot at church
tomorrow morning.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com
http://400tx.blogspot.com/



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
SonC@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 4:59 PM
To: lug@leica-users.org
Subject: Re: [Leica] M5 - what to look for - was M4 variants


 
 
In a message dated 12/24/2006 4:56:00 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
jsmith342@cox.net writes:

I belive  that their viewfinder may be a bit more precise due to a longer
base.

No, It can use the 135 2.8  It is the same
 

 

Regards,  
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
Natchitoches, Louisiana
Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
?galit?, libert?,  crawfish

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] M5 - what to look for - was M4 variants)