Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Tina.. I read it wrong. That makes a lot more sense.... Frank Filippone red735i@earthlink.net -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 6:19 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] WTB : Noctilux (UK) At 08:49 PM 12/31/2006, you wrote: >I did not follow Tina's statement about the light through the 50 Summilux >at F1.4 and the Noctilux at F1 being about the same >amount.... Can someone please explain? Tina? > >Or did I read it wrong? > >Frank Filippone >red735i@earthlink.net Frank - I was referring to the 35/1.4 and the Noctilux 1.0 - just that the 35 is wider and encompasses more light and you can also hold it at slower speeds so I find that I can take photos with the 35/1.4 in about the same light as the Noctilux 1.0. The depth of field will still be greater, though. Tina Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA http://www.tinamanley.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information