Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I suspect that Kyle's "rules" (just as the PAW) are having the precise effect(s) that I imagine he intends: get folks to talk about real issues and get out deal with them photographically. Regards, George Lottermoser george@imagist.com On Jan 19, 2007, at 5:08 PM, larry.k@rcn.com wrote: > Bravo Adam! I also found myself wondering why anyone should > listen to this > guy and his rules! Who made this guy the philosopher king of > photography? > > Let's see, from reading the LUG for a while, I see it is ok to > fly to remote parts > of the world and photograph the poverty but it is not ok to > photograph the > poverty under your own nose, in your own country. Ah, I get it now. > We wouldn't > want our politicians to be held responsible for their lack of > policies to alleviate > homelessness or for other people to be forced to see how many > people in this > country live in poverty, without access to decent housing or health > care. > > I find it interesting that Omar gets alienated more and more by > the community, > probably forcing him further into desperate circumstances. Maybe > the policy > should be "Some Omar" instead of "No Omar"! Maybe a nice lawyer > should file a > lawsuit on Omar's behalf for being denied service by these > establishments! > > I think all people are tolerable in small doses, probably even > this Kyle guy. > Maybe.