Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Philippe Orlent wrote: > Since I won't be buying an M8, and waiting for an M9 -not being sure if > it will be worth all the bucks, and if it will be full sensor- is not > really an option, I have some decisions to make. > Digital has always been a bit on the side: not that I don't have good > digital cameras, but the ones that I have, have their quirkinesses. > Until now, that wasn't a problem, because most of the time that I was > really concentrating on photography, it was still an analog process. But > the beast of full digital has been roaring in my head for too long now. > So I've come to the conclusion that, to keeps things simple and > pleasant, digital is the way to go, even if my hearth still tends to > these mechanical beauties that were made in former eras. > I'll go the Canon 5D route, and I have almost decided on lenses, too. > I'm pretty sure that a lot of you switched to or embraced Canon, so some > first hand experiences would help to smoothen out the 'fear' for the > steep costs involved. > > What are your impressions of the following lenses? > Canon EF 24-70mm L f2.8 USM > > Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM > > Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8L USM > > And, if you'd only keep one lens on your analog M, which one would that be? > > I was thinking of selling everything except for one good M body, and > then buying a Summilux 35 ASPH to glue on it forever. A perfect B&W > street dedicated machine, so to speak. > > Other -and wise(r)- suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Philippe > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > Hi Phillipe, I think you're right on the 35mm on the M body. But I'd take the Summicron 4th. Just for the bokeh Digital is nice and fast. However I do not enjoy it as much as film. -- Best regards, Michiel Fokkema