Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] So after lusting after the classical 35mm Summicrons, I read that the 40mm Summicron-c is a better lens.
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Tue Feb 13 18:19:31 2007
 
By the way, this all comes about because I bought an RD1, and am having a
great time with it.  

I don't own any 35mm Leica glass, but have plenty of Nikon RF wide angle
glass, and have been shooting with those lenses, using an S-mount to M
adapter.

Thus the lusting for some 35mm Leica glass.....

Vick 

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Vick
Ko
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:17 PM
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: [Leica] So after lusting after the classical 35mm Summicrons,I read
that the 40mm Summicron-c is a better lens.

So after lusting after the classical 35mm Summicrons (non-ASPH), I read that
the 40mm Summicron-c is a better lens.

Is that so?  Anyone have experiences with both, and can comment?

Even better is that I have a 40mm Summicron-C, and can stop thinking that I
need to spend more money.

regards
Vick
In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] So after lusting after the classical 35mm Summicrons, I read that the 40mm Summicron-c is a better lens.)