Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Great catch this one is. BTW 1956 is a very good vintage year says Phil..x, who was born on that year and wishes the baby and family the best, and the M and the photographer as many years of as perfect cooperation as on this one. . Yours Phil..x Jim Shulman wrote: >Remembered a thread a few days back about pictures with smiles, or ones that >cause them. (I really loved the Hell station, especially after filling up >the '57 Dodge the other day with premium!_ > >On Friday visited a friend in the area, who just gave birth to a baby boy in >January. Xander is her joy and a triumph--the first successful birth after >a decade of fertility treatments. He's out of his "strangers virus" >quarantine period, so we were vetted for a visit. > >http://tinyurl.com/2g9gur > >They told me no flash; I told them no problem. Used my digital M3, with old >Summilux 50 and Ilford XP2 digital film. When they asked me how I could >take pictures in such low light without an in-camera flash, I began talking >about 1956 technology. > >Best, >Jim Shulman >Bryn Mawr, PA Who's off to pick up the prints. > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >