Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Sat May 5 16:16:50 2007
References: <463C8BF9.5050306@dlridings.se> <20070505142844.465C42FBC1@donald.hostspirit.ch>

Maybe worth a look at the CV 2.5 35 Colour Skopar as well. Not collapsible 
but very compact. Mo concerns about fogging etc being a
new lens. Even has the groovy little Barnack lever for focus. Uses the 
plentiful and cheap 39mm Leitz filters.
Mine has good sharpness and contrast. I'll send you a test example. Its not 
worthy of posting to the group, just being a test shot.

What finder do you plan to use on the 111c/111f?

Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----

Subject: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron

Daniel

Just an idea - have you thought about the very small 35/2.5 W-Nikkor-C 
(LTM), see http://tinyurl.com/32edo4 ? The lens is certainly
a better performer than the 35/3.5 Elmar. I have one and am thinking of 
buying a LTM Leica body just for that lens. Actually I have
it on the Bessa L with the 35 minifinder - kind of Leica I feeling with 
inbuilt meter and flip-out back door... 

Didier



>I am toying with the idea of picking up a compact 35mm lens for a Leica 
>IIIf or IIIc. The way photography is working out, I end up
using a digital outfit for quite a lot, but want to have a 400 b/w body 
along for the ride. The screwmount Leicas work out nicely
for this and the 50/3.5 Elmar is a good companion.
>
>I'd like a 35 mm that compares with the collapsed Elmar when it comes to 
>size and that leads me to these two lenses (in the subject
line).
>
>I would expect that the 35/3.5 Elmar is not much of a performer. I've never 
>really heard anyone saying much good about it (not much
bad either). I suppose that it is a piece of glass reflecting its day and 
age.
>
>Anyway, if anyone has experiences with these, I'd appreciate hearing it. I 
>know about watching for haze and stuff like that.
>
>This will be for b/w, of course. I've mentioned that.
>
>Daniel


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron)
In reply to: Message from dlr at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron)
Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron)