Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] SLD ? R9.99 ? Link is OK now
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu Sep 20 17:16:52 2007
References: <092020070210.762.46F1D6A8000ACFAF000002FA219791332903010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com> <3cad89990709192024p6865a3d2u2e5081dc108de6b1@mail.gmail.com> <46F30AF2.3070106@san.rr.com>

On Sep 20, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote:

> Jay,
>
> Do you know what a naif is?  A person who is naive.  A lot of us  
> have to buy Leica goods on the used market
> as we cannot afford the new stuff..  A lot of us cannot declare  
> Leica purchases as a deductible business expense.
>
> I dinna care to help Leica survive.  Being on Social Security , I  
> want to survive.


ahhh, but you have a job and live in La Jolla...

so you may be better off than Leica AG...

and you may live longer,

Steve
>
> Jerry
>
>
> Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>> What amuses me in this whole exchange of emails is, save the M8/ 
>> DMR, nobody
>> seems to buy anything made by Leica new. If Leica don't sell  
>> lenses, where
>> will they make their annuity income from? I don't think they make  
>> much money
>> on camera bodies. I think the whole point of the new Summarit  
>> lenses is to
>> maximise the profitable end of the business - a wise business  
>> move, and one
>> that will pay off a lot more than an M9 or R10. If the members of  
>> the list
>> wish to strengthen Leica so they can survive, buy their lenses new  
>> - or buy
>> ala carte bodies!!!
>> Cheers
>> Jayanand
>>
>>
>> On 9/20/07, grduprey@mchsi.com <grduprey@mchsi.com> wrote:
>>
>>> George,
>>> I can't agree with you too much.  I have an SL, R4SP, and a R8,  
>>> which I
>>> bought thinking I would get a DMR.  Can't afford one now, but  
>>> maybe I can
>>> find one at a good price, or the R10 will come out with a good
>>> price.  ;-)  I have a D200, but find I pick up the R8 90% of the  
>>> time.  The
>>> D200 has some neat features, but the R8 and the R glass is my  
>>> first choice,
>>> period.  No uncertainty at all.
>>>
>>> Gene
>>>
>>> -------------- Original message from Lottermoser George  
>>> <imagist3@mac.com>:
>>> --------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2 R3's, R8, R8 with DMR and all of my R glass I've purchased  
>>>> used. No
>>>> uncertainty. The lenses will last the rest of my life. I have no
>>>> doubt the R8 and R8/DMR will also outlast me. What's the  
>>>> problem? If
>>>> Leica never comes out with another R body - what's the problem with
>>>> the stuff you have and inventory available on a good, solid used
>>>> market? Sorry. I just don't get it.
>>>>
>>>> If you feel less "uncertain" in the Nikon "forever" better and  
>>>> better
>>>> world - that's just fine. Enjoy. The image, after all, is all that
>>>> really matters. And for that - all you need is an oatmeal box and
>>>> some tin foil. ;~)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>> george@imagist.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 19, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Christopher Birchenhall wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> As to the DMR I have to
>>>>> note I bought a R8 planning on gettig a DMR only to find Leica  
>>>>> pulling
>>>>> that plug without a hint as to what the future of the R mount  
>>>>> might
>>>>> look like. Here the uncertainty is for me real and is reflected  
>>>>> in my
>>>>> actions - back to Nikon SLRs for me.
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> L
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] SLD ? R9.99 ? Link is OK now)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] SLD ? R9.99 ? Link is OK now)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] SLD ? R9.99 ? Link is OK now)