Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/10/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Actually, I was curious about the vibration and damping characteristics of wood tripods as compared to similarly sized Carbon Fiber or Aluminium models. A kilo here or there, is not all that important. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, 28 October, 2007 9:42 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] Wooden tripods >I suspect the desire to go either wood or CF is driven by weight. What I > have found is that you can substantially reduce the weight of your current > tripod by the correct choice of tripod head, without the big price of the > CF legs.... Heads weigh as much as the legs, in many cases. > > Look at the Manfrotto 3275 / Bogen 410 model for an example.... more than > sufficient for 35mm..... Used a lot by 4x5 guys. You could move down in > features a step to the ball heads, more than sufficient for a Leica.... > etc. > > BTW, I went looking for a traveling tripod recently.... something to fit > inside a carry on suitcase, suitable for Hasselblad or Leica. After a lot > of looking, the Gitzo 1228 won out. The funny part is that I already > owned > a 1228, and thus all my research just reaffirmed my old decision. > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net